Case scenarios about retail payments supervision

Publication date: December 12, 2023
Last updated: October 2, 2024

Find case scenarios to help individuals and entities determine whether they are subject to the Retail Payment Activities Act and should register with the Bank.

19 result(s)

August 21, 2024

Case scenarios about e-commerce web building tools and payment gateways

The following fictional case scenarios provide examples of payment functions, namely the initiation of an electronic funds transfer (EFT) at the request of an end user, and the authorization of an EFT or the transmission, reception or facilitation of an instruction in relation to the EFT. They also provide examples of incidental activities under the Retail Payment Activities Act.
December 12, 2023

Case scenarios about payment accounting software and invoice payment services

The following fictional case scenarios provide details about the payment functions: provision or maintenance of an account on behalf of an end user; the initiation of an electronic funds transfer at the request of an end user; the provision of clearing and settlement services; as well as examples of incidental activities under the Retail Payment Activities Act.
Go To Page

Contains

Content Types

Topics

Published After

Published Before

Disclaimer

The case scenarios are illustrative examples reflecting the Bank of Canada’s interpretation of certain requirements set out in the Retail Payment Activities Act (RPAA). All names, facts and descriptions in these scenarios are entirely fictitious and do not reflect any real or actual individuals or entities.

Additionally, they do not represent legal advice and should not be used as a replacement for seeking such advice if an individual or entity is unsure about whether they are required to register with the Bank of Canada as a payment service provider. The nature of the products and services offered by each individual or entity will vary, as will the circumstances around offering these products and services. Therefore, any individual or entity that may be subject to the RPAA should assess their own situation on a case-by-case basis according to their own facts and circumstances. Any entity or individual that may be subject to the RPAA is ultimately responsible for determining whether they are required to register with the Bank.

The examples provided are not a replacement for the Criteria for registering payment service providers supervisory policy, but rather they are meant to complement the policy. They should be read in conjunction with the policy.

If you have questions about retail payments supervision or have any comments on this topic, contact us.